bg‑azure

You are going to read a text about lack of privacy, the price of fame that celebrities have to pay for their luxurious lives. Or do they? Do they have similar rights to privacy as anybody else or should they be treated differently since they get benefits from being famous? If you would like to get answers to these questions read the text below.

Przeczytasz tekst na temat braku prywatności i ceny sławy, jaką celebryci muszą zapłacić za swoje luksusowe życie. Czy na pewno muszą? Czy mają podobne prawo do prywatności jak pozostali ludzie, czy może powinni być traktowani inaczej, skoro czerpią korzyści z bycia na świeczniku? Jeśli chcesz poznać odpowiedzi na te pytania, przeczytaj poniższy tekst.

R1bOxkcLA5WqX
What is the cost of fame?
Jaki jest koszt sławy?
Źródło: dostępny w internecie: www.freepik.com [dostęp 27.12.2021], domena publiczna.
Exercise 1

Przeciągnij słowa lub wyrażenia opisujące typowe działania celebrytów, aby dopasować je do ich tłumaczenia.

Drag the words or expressions, describing typical activities of a celebrity, to match them with their translation.

R1VPSTPnbaqb7
interviews Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. sesje upiększające, 2. praca w cudownych miejscach, 3. podróżowanie, 4. aktualizacja social mediów, 5. spotkanie z agentami/managerami, 6. wywiady, 7. ceremonie rozdania nagród working on amazing locations Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. sesje upiększające, 2. praca w cudownych miejscach, 3. podróżowanie, 4. aktualizacja social mediów, 5. spotkanie z agentami/managerami, 6. wywiady, 7. ceremonie rozdania nagród briefings with agents Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. sesje upiększające, 2. praca w cudownych miejscach, 3. podróżowanie, 4. aktualizacja social mediów, 5. spotkanie z agentami/managerami, 6. wywiady, 7. ceremonie rozdania nagród travelling Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. sesje upiększające, 2. praca w cudownych miejscach, 3. podróżowanie, 4. aktualizacja social mediów, 5. spotkanie z agentami/managerami, 6. wywiady, 7. ceremonie rozdania nagród award ceremonies Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. sesje upiększające, 2. praca w cudownych miejscach, 3. podróżowanie, 4. aktualizacja social mediów, 5. spotkanie z agentami/managerami, 6. wywiady, 7. ceremonie rozdania nagród social media updates Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. sesje upiększające, 2. praca w cudownych miejscach, 3. podróżowanie, 4. aktualizacja social mediów, 5. spotkanie z agentami/managerami, 6. wywiady, 7. ceremonie rozdania nagród beauty sessions Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. sesje upiększające, 2. praca w cudownych miejscach, 3. podróżowanie, 4. aktualizacja social mediów, 5. spotkanie z agentami/managerami, 6. wywiady, 7. ceremonie rozdania nagród
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
R1OFaRPS9QifD1
Exercise 1
Drag the words or expressions, describing typical activities of a celebrity, to match them with the pictures.
Źródło: dostępny w internecie: www.freepik.com [dostęp 27.12.2021], www.pixabay.com [dostęp 12.2021], www.unsplash.com [dostęp 27.12.2021], domena publiczna.
The Price of Fame
Agnieszka Sękiewicz‑Magoń The Price of Fame

For many celebrities, living in the limelightin the limelightin the limelight comes at a price, sometimes too high to pay, because it means losing privacy and being treated like a commoditycommoditycommodity rather than a human being. When we look at this issue from the perspective of celebrities, we can see the extent of this problem and what unpleasant experiences it often involves.

First of all, famous people lose their privacy due to being in gossip magazinesgossip magazines [gossip magazine]gossip magazines and celebrity gossip websites, where a lot of information about them is additionally distorteddistorteddistorted or fabricatedfabricatedfabricated by journalists so that it should sound sensationalsensationalsensational. They also have to deal with ubiquitousubiquitousubiquitous paparazzipaparazzi (plural) [paparazzo]paparazzi, chasing them unrelentinglyunrelentinglyunrelentingly in the streets, in restaurants, fitness clubs or even their children’s schools, and trying to take a photo in the most private, uncomfortable or embarrassing moments. They encounter infatuatedinfatuatedinfatuated fans, begging for an autograph or a picture, or camping near their homes in the hope of having a conversation or making friends with them. Finally, they attract stalkersstalkers [stalker]stalkers who are imagining thingsimagining things [imagine things]imagining things about them, such as having a romantic relationship with them or knowing them better than anybody else. Such people harassharassharass their famous victims mercilesslymercilesslymercilessly, both physically and psychologically, following them or writing emails with threatsthreats [threat]threats. And all these people think that they have a right to do this because in their opinion a famous person in fact belongs to the public.

Some people argue that it is not such a big price to pay when compared to all the vast richesvast richesvast riches and privilegesprivileges [privilege]privileges that fame brings. When you become a celebrity, you have to accept the reality that you lose your privacy and that from now on you will be gossiped about, scrutinised, laughed at, but also loved by fans. That is what being in the public eyebeing in the public eyebeing in the public eye means. Besides, you need public interest for your job, so do not complain about losing your privacy.

The subject of celebrities’ right to privacy is very complexcomplex (adj)complex, as in many countries there are laws which are contradictorycontradictorycontradictory to each other: on the one hand, some of them guarantee constitutional protection of citizens’ rightscitizens’ rightscitizens’ rights to safety and privacy, on the other hand, some other laws grantgrantgrant increased freedom of expressionfreedom of expressionfreedom of expression to the press. Even if there are constitutional laws about privacy, they are often violatedviolatedviolated when it comes towhen it comes towhen it comes to celebrities, causing numerous legal battleslegal battleslegal battles in the Supreme and High Courts of many countries, and the verdicts varyvaryvary significantly, depending on where the case was heard. The biggest difference can be seen in the privacy laws given to European celebrities versus those granted to American stars. In the United States, the right to privacy is almost always trumpedtrumped [trump]trumped by the First Amendment.

The question then is if we should regardregard asregard every celebrity asregard asaspublic figurepublic figurepublic figure, and if their private lives should be treated as “matters of public interest”. It is a different case, for example, with politicians, who are often well‑known and recognised figures, but at the same time they are public servantspublic servants [public servant]public servants so their activities are and should be of public interest. That also includes pictures of such activities. However, if the photographs are not of public interest, as it usually is the case with celebrities, they should not be published without the person’s permissionpermissionpermission. This would be a respectfulrespectfulrespectful way of treating a person’s private and family life, but unfortunately in many countries such regulations either do not exist or, if they do, they are not complied withcomplied withcomplied with by most individuals, especially members of the media.

1 Źródło: Agnieszka Sękiewicz‑Magoń, dostępny w internecie: Right of Publicity, https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1011/right-of-publicity [dostęp 4.04.2022], Celebrities and the First Amendment: Broader Protection Against the Unauthorized Publication of Photographs the Unauthorized Publication of Photographs, https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2163&context=ilj&httpsredir=1&referer= [dostęp 4.04.2022], licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Exercise 2

Based on information in the text, answer the questions below using full sentences.

  1. Why might being famous be a problem for celebrities?

  2. Which of the mentioned types of people who harass celebrities show positive feelings towards them?

  3. What does it mean that laws are often contradictory?

  4. What is the difference between European and American interpretations of privacy laws?

  5. Why shouldn’t celebrities’ photos be published without their permission?

R1NHJ5AJi0L4R
1. Why might being famous be a problem for celebrities? 2. Which of the mentioned types of people harassing celebrities show seemingly positive feelings towards them? 3. What does it mean that laws are often contradictory? 4. What is the difference between European and American interpretations of privacy laws? 5. Why shouldn’t celebrities’ photos be published without their permission? (Uzupełnij).
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
RTKgL3eXc1hYz
Exercise 3
Read the text above. Then, drag and drop the elements below to fill in the text. I am a celebrity, but I refuse to be regarded as a     1. 1. unrelentingly, 2. commodity, 3. human dignity, 4. legal battles, 5. gossip magazines, 6. harass, 7. in the limelight, 8. stalkers, 9. violated, 10. sensational.     I am famous, there is no doubt about it, but at the same time I am also a person, so I deserve respect and     2. 1. unrelentingly, 2. commodity, 3. human dignity, 4. legal battles, 5. gossip magazines, 6. harass, 7. in the limelight, 8. stalkers, 9. violated, 10. sensational     as much as anybody else. Most people think my life is fabulous, but they forget about its dark side, for example     3. 1. unrelentingly, 2. commodity, 3. human dignity, 4. legal battles, 5. gossip magazines, 6. harass, 7. in the limelight, 8. stalkers, 9. violated, 10. sensational     threatening to kill me if I don’t return their sick love, or paparazzi who follow me     4. 1. unrelentingly, 2. commodity, 3. human dignity, 4. legal battles, 5. gossip magazines, 6. harass, 7. in the limelight, 8. stalkers, 9. violated, 10. sensational,     trying to take the best photo which they could publish in     5. 1. unrelentingly, 2. commodity, 3. human dignity, 4. legal battles, 5. gossip magazines, 6. harass, 7. in the limelight, 8. stalkers, 9. violated, 10. sensational     next to     6. 1. unrelentingly, 2. commodity, 3. human dignity, 4. legal battles, 5. gossip magazines, 6. harass, 7. in the limelight, 8. stalkers, 9. violated, 10. sensational     articles full of lies about me. I must admit I didn’t fully understand what it really meant to constantly be     7. 1. unrelentingly, 2. commodity, 3. human dignity, 4. legal battles, 5. gossip magazines, 6. harass, 7. in the limelight, 8. stalkers, 9. violated, 10. sensational,     but now I am doing my best to try and deal with all the public interest in me and the people who     8. 1. unrelentingly, 2. commodity, 3. human dignity, 4. legal battles, 5. gossip magazines, 6. harass, 7. in the limelight, 8. stalkers, 9. violated, 10. sensational     me because they think they are entitled to do so. When they cross the line, however, they must be prepared for     9. 1. unrelentingly, 2. commodity, 3. human dignity, 4. legal battles, 5. gossip magazines, 6. harass, 7. in the limelight, 8. stalkers, 9. violated, 10. sensational     in a court because I will sue anybody if I feel they have     10. 1. unrelentingly, 2. commodity, 3. human dignity, 4. legal battles, 5. gossip magazines, 6. harass, 7. in the limelight, 8. stalkers, 9. violated, 10. sensational     my right to privacy. So, if you think you can take every piece of me just because I am a celebrity, you are wrong, so you’d better keep away from me!
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
R1Z9RSXreJnCv
Exercise 4
Read the text above. Then, type in the translations of the missing words to complete the summary below. Use the expressions from the text. The text is about celebrities’     4.1 (prawo do prywatności) Tu uzupełnij     and what     4.2 (życie w blasku reflektorów) Tu uzupełnij     potentially involves. The text gives several examples of people who     4.3 (nękają) Tu uzupełnij     celebrities, such as paparazzi, crazy fans or stalkers. The main argument that the text gives as to why celebrities should accept the fact that they don’t have privacy is that they enjoy     4.4 (ogromne bogactwa) Tu uzupełnij     and privileges as a result of being famous. The text mentions that some laws concerning privacy have a     4.5 (sprzeczne) Tu uzupełnij     meaning, because they either give more     4.6 (wolność wypowiedzi) Tu uzupełnij,     or limit it so as to protect a person’s rights. There is also a comparison of two attitudes towards the interpretation of these rights in Europe and the United States, which shows that for Americans only one 4.7 (artykuł prawny) Tu uzupełnij is important in any disputes over privacy, namely the 4.8 (Pierwsza Poprawka) Tu uzupełnij.     The text ends with a conclusion that celebrities’ personal lives should be kept away from the public, because famous people are not     4.9 (urzędnicy państwowi) Tu uzupełnij     like politicians, so they have the right to protect their privacy like anybody else.
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
GRAMATYKA

Reported Speech is a grammatical structure in which we report what was said earlier. The main rule is that while doing it, we often have to use a tense which is further back in the past than the tense originally used (it is called “backshifting”). The structure of the reported clause depends on whether the speaker reports a statement, a question or a command. Here are the main rules:

a)    We often use a tense which is „further back” in the past than the tense originally used, so for example Present Simple is changed into Past Simple, Present Continuous into Past Continuous, and Past Simple into Past Perfect, etc.

Examples:

“I’m going to buy a new car,” she said. – „Zamierzam kupić nowy samochód”, powiedziała.

She said that she was going to buy a new car. – Powiedziała, że zamierza kupić nowy samochód.

“We were on holiday together,” they said. – „Byliśmy razem na wakacjach”, powiedzieli.

They said that they had been on holiday together. – Powiedzieli, że byli razem na wakacjach.

b)    We usually change time and place expressions if reporting occurs at a different time or place, so for example today turns into that day, and here becomes there, etc.

Examples:

“I need you here,” she told me. – „Potrzebuję cię tutaj”, powiedziała mi.

She told me she needed me there. – Powiedziała mi, że mnie tam potrzebuje.

“We will move out tomorrow,” they said. – „Jutro się wyprowadzimy”, mówili.

They said they would move out the next day. – Powiedzieli, że wyprowadzą się następnego dnia.

„You didn't tell me about this last week,” he said. - „Nie powiedziałaś mi o tym w zeszłym tygodniu”, powiedział mi.

He said I hadn't told him about it the previous week. - Powiedział, ze nie poinformowałam go o tym w poprzednim tygodniu.

c)    We might have to change some pronouns (e.g. I or we) and possessive adjectives (e.g. my or your).

Examples:

“I will never forget you,” he told her. – „Nigdy cię nie zapomnę”, powiedział jej.

He told her that he would never forget her. – Powiedział jej, że nigdy jej nie zapomni.

“My sister took a picture of you,” she told me.„Moja siostra zrobiła ci zdjęcie”, powiedziała mi.

She told me that her sister had taken a picture of me. – Powiedziała mi, że jej siostra zrobiła mi zdjęcie.

d)    When reporting a question, we have to come back to the order of an affirmative sentence (because it’s not a question any more – it has changed into a statement) which means that there is no inverted order or auxiliary verbs like “do” or “did.”

Examples:

“Have you seen my shoes?” he asked me. – „Widziałeś/Widziałaś moje buty?”, zapytał mnie.

He asked me if I had seen his shoes. – Zapytał mnie, czy widziałem/widziałam jego buty.

“Does your mum know about it?” she asked him. – „Czy twoja mama o tym wie?”, zapytała go.

She asked him if his mum knew about it. – Zapytała go, czy jego mama o tym wie.

e)    When reporting a yes/no question, we use “if” or “whether.”

Examples:

“Are you hungry?” I asked her. – „Jesteś głodna?”, zapytałem ją.

I asked her if she was hungry. – Zapytałem ją, czy jest głodna.

“Did you take it or leave it?” he asked her. – „Wzięłaś to czy zostawiłaś?”, zapytał.

He asked her whether she had taken it or had left it. – Zapytał ją, czy to wzięła, czy zostawiła.

f)     When reporting a command, we use an infinitive form of the verb.

Examples:

“Sit down here,” they told me. – Powiedzieli mi: „Usiądź tutaj”.

They told me to sit down there. – Kazali mi tam usiąść.

“Don’t say a word,” she told him. – „Nie mów ani słowa”, powiedziała mu.

She told him not to say a word. – Powiedziała mu, żeby nie mówił ani słowa.

g)    When we report a general truth or what we report is still true, we keep the original tense.

Examples:

“It gets cold in winter in Poland,” he said. – „W Polsce zimą jest zimno”, powiedział.

He said that it gets cold in winter in Poland. – Powiedział, że zimą w Polsce jest zimno.

“I need a new report,” said Jane. – „Potrzebuję nowego raportu”, powiedziała Jane.

Jane said she needs a new report (she still hasn’t got one). – Jane powiedziała, że potrzebuje nowego raportu (nadal go nie dostała).

h)    We don’t use backshifting for reporting 2Indeks górny nd or 3Indeks górny rd conditional.

Examples:

“If I were you, I wouldn’t do it,” he told me. – „Na twoim miejscu nie robiłbym tego”, powiedział mi.

He told me that if he were me, he wouldn’t do it. – Powiedział mi, że nie zrobiłby tego na moim miejscu.

Exercise 5
R1GY1HYfY9aPX
Read the explanations above. Next, drag and drop elements to match grammar rules with example sentences. She told me that her brother wanted to introduce me to their mum. Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. We change the tense “one step back.”, 2. We change time and place expressions if reporting occurs at a different time and place., 3. When we report a general truth, we keep the original tense., 4. If what we report is still true or relevant, we keep the original tense., 5. When reporting a yes/no question, we use “if.”, 6. When reporting a command, we use an infinitive form of the verb., 7. When reporting a question, we have to come back to the order of an affirmative sentence., 8. We might have to change some pronouns and possessive adjectives. The teacher said that it is always hot in Africa. Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. We change the tense “one step back.”, 2. We change time and place expressions if reporting occurs at a different time and place., 3. When we report a general truth, we keep the original tense., 4. If what we report is still true or relevant, we keep the original tense., 5. When reporting a yes/no question, we use “if.”, 6. When reporting a command, we use an infinitive form of the verb., 7. When reporting a question, we have to come back to the order of an affirmative sentence., 8. We might have to change some pronouns and possessive adjectives. He asked me what my name was. Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. We change the tense “one step back.”, 2. We change time and place expressions if reporting occurs at a different time and place., 3. When we report a general truth, we keep the original tense., 4. If what we report is still true or relevant, we keep the original tense., 5. When reporting a yes/no question, we use “if.”, 6. When reporting a command, we use an infinitive form of the verb., 7. When reporting a question, we have to come back to the order of an affirmative sentence., 8. We might have to change some pronouns and possessive adjectives. I said that I would wait for it. Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. We change the tense “one step back.”, 2. We change time and place expressions if reporting occurs at a different time and place., 3. When we report a general truth, we keep the original tense., 4. If what we report is still true or relevant, we keep the original tense., 5. When reporting a yes/no question, we use “if.”, 6. When reporting a command, we use an infinitive form of the verb., 7. When reporting a question, we have to come back to the order of an affirmative sentence., 8. We might have to change some pronouns and possessive adjectives. She asked if I liked jazz. Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. We change the tense “one step back.”, 2. We change time and place expressions if reporting occurs at a different time and place., 3. When we report a general truth, we keep the original tense., 4. If what we report is still true or relevant, we keep the original tense., 5. When reporting a yes/no question, we use “if.”, 6. When reporting a command, we use an infinitive form of the verb., 7. When reporting a question, we have to come back to the order of an affirmative sentence., 8. We might have to change some pronouns and possessive adjectives. They said they had seen me the day before. Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. We change the tense “one step back.”, 2. We change time and place expressions if reporting occurs at a different time and place., 3. When we report a general truth, we keep the original tense., 4. If what we report is still true or relevant, we keep the original tense., 5. When reporting a yes/no question, we use “if.”, 6. When reporting a command, we use an infinitive form of the verb., 7. When reporting a question, we have to come back to the order of an affirmative sentence., 8. We might have to change some pronouns and possessive adjectives. He told me not to worry about anything. Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. We change the tense “one step back.”, 2. We change time and place expressions if reporting occurs at a different time and place., 3. When we report a general truth, we keep the original tense., 4. If what we report is still true or relevant, we keep the original tense., 5. When reporting a yes/no question, we use “if.”, 6. When reporting a command, we use an infinitive form of the verb., 7. When reporting a question, we have to come back to the order of an affirmative sentence., 8. We might have to change some pronouns and possessive adjectives. He told me his brother works for an international corporation. Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. We change the tense “one step back.”, 2. We change time and place expressions if reporting occurs at a different time and place., 3. When we report a general truth, we keep the original tense., 4. If what we report is still true or relevant, we keep the original tense., 5. When reporting a yes/no question, we use “if.”, 6. When reporting a command, we use an infinitive form of the verb., 7. When reporting a question, we have to come back to the order of an affirmative sentence., 8. We might have to change some pronouns and possessive adjectives.
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Exercise 6
RtxsZnxX1MW2m
Read the grammar section and type in the words to complete the sentences. 1. “I don’t want to hurt her feelings,” he told her. He told her that     Tu uzupełnij. 2. “Sit down and wait for me here,” she said to him. She told him     Tu uzupełnij. 3. “Why didn’t you tell me about it last week?” John asked me John asked me why     Tu uzupełnij. 4. “We will give you all the details tomorrow, “ they told us. They told us that     Tu uzupełnij. 5. “Did you manage to finish your essay yesterday?” she asked him She asked him     Tu uzupełnij. 6. “Open your suitcase, please,” the customs officer asked me. The customs officer asked me     Tu uzupełnij. 7. “I have never seen anything like this in my life,” she said. She said that     Tu uzupełnij. 8. “Where are we supposed to go now?” they asked. They asked     Tu uzupełnij. 9. “Winters are really cold in this country,” she told us. She told us that     Tu uzupełnij. 10. “I was waiting for you all evening,” he told her. He told her that     Tu uzupełnij.
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.

Słownik

being in the public eye
being in the public eye

/ ˈbiːɪŋ ɪn ðə ˌpʌblɪk aɪ /

RfAof0rDAvKc51
Nagranie dźwiękowe

bycie na widoku publicznym, bycie na świeczniku

R14xHcJk3jhLe1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
citizens’ rights
citizens’ rights

/ ˈsɪtɪzənz raɪts /

RTBUslAk7FUuq1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

prawa obywatelskie

RD1m48i9ho56F1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
commodity
commodity

/ kəˈmɒdɪti /

RQypjj9o6PXCb1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

towar, artykuł (a good that can be bought or sold)

RGpYCZNPxtPxo1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
complex (adj)
complex (adj)

/ ˈkɒmpleks /

R1GIdnKWex2p01
Nagranie dźwiękowe

złożony/złożona, skomplikowany/skomplikowana

R1QgHBRYx5TbP1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
complied with
complied with

/ kəmˈplaɪd wɪð /

R1I6utpemBpje1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

przestrzegane

RNMqsTDBCd6eS1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
contradictory
contradictory

/ ˌkɒntrəˈdɪktəri /

RfroUaMKTm8051
Nagranie dźwiękowe

sprzeczny/sprzeczna, przeciwstawny/przeciwstawna

RWHhhf1gqsjte1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
distorted
distorted

/ dɪˈstɔːtɪd /

R1d60EyfwAgJ21
Nagranie dźwiękowe

zniekształcony/zniekształcona (false or misleading)

RjVMtqN7q3xKr1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
fabricated
fabricated

/ ˈfæbrɪkeɪtɪd /

Rne3Kg1F5SCDv1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

sfabrykowany/sfabrykowana, wymyślony/wymyślona

RVRzWJtU2Bg7p1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
First Amendment
First Amendment

/ ˈfɜ:st əˈmendmənt /

R1BNWzcIEVAps1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

Pierwsza Poprawka (do konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych)

RMk9zhn3qWc9C1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
freedom of expression
freedom of expression

/ ˈfriːdəm əv ɪkˈspreʃn̩ /

RUa0wYhq3oD5N1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

wolność wypowiedzi, wolność wyrażania opinii

R8q4tWffuz44O1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
gossip magazines [gossip magazine]
gossip magazines [gossip magazine]

/ ˈɡɒsɪp ˌmæɡəˈziːnz / / ˈɡɒsɪp ˌmæɡəˈziːn /

RA7vN88hdut3U1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

magazyny plotkarskie [magazyn plotkarski]

Rv73G3ICBThB61
Nagranie dźwiękowe
grant
grant

/ ɡrɑːnt /

RKGJQtHkN5Q4T1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

przyznać, udzielać

RA4Sqo8oWarcd1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
harass
harass

/ ˈhærəs /

RIjrSTH0MQvJP1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

nękać

R1bK3t9WPDjEo1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
imagining things [imagine things]
imagining things [imagine things]

/ ɪˈmædʒɪnɪŋ ˈthetaɪŋz / / ɪˈmædʒɪn ˈthetaɪŋz /

RJXS61mpGCKEn1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

wyobrażają sobie niestworzone rzeczy [wyobrażać sobie niestworzone rzeczy]

RXqMwgb1Ee6WG1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
infatuated
infatuated

/ ɪnˈfætʃʊeɪtɪd /

R1a0URDSpKrbx1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

zadurzony/zadurzona, zauroczony/zauroczona (foolishly or unreasonably attracted to or in love with somebody)

RfJWc7jMqvAlZ1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
intimidating
intimidating

/ ɪnˈtɪmɪdeɪtɪŋ /

RakhZzx7PpEFM1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

onieśmielający/onieśmielająca, zastraszający/zastraszająca (threatening)

R1dAOs86Q9rkD1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
in the limelight
in the limelight

/ ɪn ðə ˈlaɪmlaɪt /

RLvXghNVmoQGS1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

w świetle reflektorów, w centrum uwagi

R1SsKptcuIyCx1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
legal battles
legal battles

/ ˈliːɡl̩ ˈbætl̩z /

R4fRMSHHVeZzC1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

batalie sądowe

RlGf2hz4PE6qw1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
mercilessly
mercilessly

/ ˈmɜːsɪlɪsli /

R1a2nza6HUfnt1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

niemiłosiernie, bezlitośnie (without mercy)

R16xdBQJVbrrd1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
outrageous
outrageous

/ aʊtˈreɪdʒəs /

Ra0gxgz5BXg2M1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

oburzający/oburzająca (violating morality or shocking because strange)

R1MXSA9UAuzIn1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
paparazzi (plural) [paparazzo]
paparazzi (plural) [paparazzo]

/ ˌpæpəˈrætse / / ˌpapəˈratsəʊ /

RLpPo55Lbdy2F1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

paparazzi (l.mn.) [paparazzo (l. poj.)] (a freelance photographer who pursues celebrities trying to take photographs of them to sell to newspapers or magazines)

Rp6EtciLVdwhw1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
permission
permission

/ pəˈmɪʃn̩ /

RNK9dVDbIO6lW1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

pozwolenie

RbJA7ElH032iO1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
previous
previous

/ ˈpriːvɪəs /

Rp1MdK5AQv59T1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

poprzedni

RW9msWw6Fg0xF1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
privileges [privilege]
privileges [privilege]

/ ˈprɪvəlɪdʒɪz / / ˈprɪvəlɪdʒ /

R1PF0Ag9JmgV51
Nagranie dźwiękowe

przywileje [przywilej]

RiphGvK7r8dTj1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
public figure
public figure

/ ˌpʌblɪk ˈfɪɡə /

RpBwSZ4pNLYNl1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

osoba publiczna

RLaljXJZwliTn1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
public servants [public servant]
public servants [public servant]

/ ˌpʌblɪk ˈsɜːvənts / / ˌpʌblɪk ˈsɜːvənt /

RADcaewY3wALi1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

urzędnicy państwowi [urzędnik państwowy / urzędniczka państwowa]

R1drRGMJh5cNc1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
regard as
regard as

/ rɪˈɡɑːd æz /

R1FJjNvEGosJJ1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

uważać za

R1X6ZsLl5lQTN1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
respectful
respectful

/ rɪˈspektfəl /

RBYxWIyJgzHPG1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

(odnoszący/odnosząca się) z szacunkiem (characterized by respect)

Rv3Me80o78Efa1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
sensational
sensational

/ sɪnˈseɪʃn̩əl /

RPSYvEbF0onKs1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

sensacyjny/sensacyjna

ROFtmUujfTcu01
Nagranie dźwiękowe
scrutinised
scrutinised

/ ˈskruːtɪnaɪzd /

ROhY53KUVXOgA1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

bacznie obserwowany/obserwowana (examined with great care or detail)

RNaezuVU0KbCW1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
stalkers [stalker]
stalkers [stalker]

/ ˈstɔːkəz / / ˈstɔːkə /

R9p7N7tstQrjF1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

natręci, stalkerzy [stalker/stalkerka]

RwWewmpAL0CCu1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
threats [threat]
threats [threat]

/ thetarets / / thetaret /

R1cOq4HVqxYoh1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

groźby [groźba]

RW2QuWGlYdMGL1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
trumped [trump]
trumped [trump]

/ trʌmpt / / trʌmp /

RqKZzJqrR4vqs1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

podważone [podważać, przewyższać, być ważniejszym niż]

RZpzh9cDUfCGL1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
ubiquitous
ubiquitous

/ juːˈbɪkwɪtəs /

RwQndVTxt9BrZ1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

wszędobylski/wszędobylska, wszechobecny/wszechobecna

RXxngKPMQdcWU1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
unrelentingly
unrelentingly

/ ˌʌnrɪˈlentɪŋli /

R1R7rskTsDRgt1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

zawzięcie, nieubłaganie

RSEVGt9PiWK8F1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
vary
vary

/ ˈveəri /

RNEkQcOC3EfO01
Nagranie dźwiękowe

różnić się

R1EDRQuIrNFSV1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
vast riches
vast riches

/ vɑːst ˈrɪtʃɪz /

RNQJNpiv4LpcB1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

ogromne bogactwa

R1UWnRMBdLQKj1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
violated
violated

/ ˈvaɪəleɪtɪd /

RxT0KWVi6jTgF1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

naruszane, łamane

R15gvJSBNGiI21
Nagranie dźwiękowe
when it comes to
when it comes to

/ wen ˈɪt ˈkʌmz tuː /

RnPqJo28JPOZ71
Nagranie dźwiękowe

gdy chodzi o

R1bCFtPCVXKDO1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY‑SA 3.0

RZoy8IUMeFLvi
(Uzupełnij).
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.