The system of government of the Republic of Poland is based on the separation of and balance between the legislative, executive and judicial powers.
The judicial power in Poland is vested in courts and tribunals.
You will learn
You will be able to describe the court system in Poland and explain the jurisdictionjurisdictionjurisdiction of each of the courts: common, military and administrative.
You will be able to name and explain the competences of the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Tribunal, and the Tribunal of State.
Everyone shall have the right to a fair and public hearinghearinghearing of his case, without undue delayundue delayundue delay, before a competent, impartialimpartialimpartial and independent court.
Exceptions to the public nature of hearings may be made for reasons of morality, State security, public order or protection of the private life of a party, or other important private interest. Judgments shall be announced publicly.
konst Source: The Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
The structure of the judiciary in Poland
RvObs7AgqKcWN
Infografika. Jej głównym elementem jest napis "Judicial power". Odchodzą od niego dwa kolejne elementy. Pierwszy to "tribunals", który dzieli się na "Constitutional Tribunal" oraz "Tribunal of State". Drugi z elementów to "Courts – administration of justice". Dzieli się on na dwie grupy. Pierwsza z nich składa się z następujących elementów "administrative courts", "Supreme Administrative Court", "voivodship administrative court". Druga nitka to "Supreme Court" i dzieli się na "common courts: courts of appeal, regional courts, district courts" oraz "military courts: military regional courts, military garrison courts".
Common courtssettleto settlesettle, among others, criminal, civil, family and guardianshipfamily and guardianship lawfamily and guardianship, and labour law cases, as well as all other matters that are not reserved for the jurisdiction of other courts.
Military courts deal first and foremostfirst and foremostfirst and foremost with matters related to offencesoffenceoffences committed by soldiers in active service.
Administrative courts primarily control the activities of public administration bodies, both governmental and self‑governmental (local governments). The control applies to, among others, administrative decisions, resolutions issued in administrative proceedingsresolution in administrative proceedingresolutions issued in administrative proceedings or complaints about inactivity of administrative bodies.
The Supreme Court supervises the judgements of common and military courts. There are two basic forms of such supervision: recognizing legal remedies against court rulingslegal remedies (against court rulings)legal remedies against court rulings adopting resolutions that resolve legal problems that raise doubt and discrepanciesdiscrepancydiscrepancies in the jurisprudencejurisprudencejurisprudence The competence of the Supreme Court also includes confirming the validityvalidityvalidity of the elections in accordance with principles specified by statute, as well as giving opinions on draft billsdraft billdraft bills and other legal acts.
RHw6rylBwQYqp
Infografika, która zatytułowana jest "Common courts – structure". Składa się z następujących elementów: Na samej górze grafiki znajduje się główny element "Supreme Court" na poziomie cassation, który składa się z dwóch elementów "regional courts" oraz "courts of appeal" na poziomie appeal oraz z dwóch elementów "district courts" oraz "regional courts" na poziomie first instance.
Exercise 1
Find three examples (e.g. online) of various cases settled by different organs of the judicial power. Analyze them and describe below.
RAyWa4qHc6Vlk
Find three examples (e.g. online) of various cases settled by different organs of the judicial power. Analyze them and describe below. Organ of the judicial power (Wybierz: district court, regional court, court of appeal, military regional court, military garrison court, Supreme Court, Supreme Administrative Court, voivodship administrative court, Constitutional Tribunal, Tribunal of State)
What was the case about?
What was the organ’s decision?
Find three examples (e.g. online) of various cases settled by different organs of the judicial power. Analyze them and describe below. Organ of the judicial power (Wybierz: district court, regional court, court of appeal, military regional court, military garrison court, Supreme Court, Supreme Administrative Court, voivodship administrative court, Constitutional Tribunal, Tribunal of State)
What was the case about?
What was the organ’s decision?
The Constitutional Tribunal
The Constitution of the Republic of Poland
The Constitutional Tribunal
Article 188
The Constitutional Tribunal shall adjudicateto adjudicateadjudicate regarding the following matters:
the conformityconformityconformity of statutes and international agreements to the Constitution;
the conformity of a statute to ratified international agreements whose ratification required prior consent granted by statute;
the conformity of legal provisions issued by central State organs to the Constitution, ratified international agreements and statutes;
konst1 Source: The Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
The main competence of the Constitutional Tribunal is to adjudicate regarding the conformity of statutes and other legal acts with the Constitution. The idea of controlling the constitutionality of law is based on the assumption that it is a hierarchical system, i.e. that the legal acts that are inferiorinferiorinferior cannot contain provisions that are contrary tocontrary tocontrary to the Constitution of other superiorsuperiorsuperior legal acts. Judgements of the Constitutional Tribunal are final. An act incompatible with the Constitution ceasesto ceaseceases to apply either at the moment of pronouncing the ruling or on a date determined by the Tribunal.
According to the Constitution, everyone whose constitutional freedoms or rights have been violated may bring a complaint concerning these infringementscomplaint concerning infringements of the Constitutioncomplaint concerning these infringements.
The Constitution of the Republic of Poland
Means for the defence of freedoms and rights
Article 79
In accordance with principles specified by statute, everyone whose constitutional freedoms or rights have been infringed, shall have the right to appeal to the Constitutional Tribunal for its judgment on the conformity to the Constitution of a statute or another normative act upon which basis a court or organ of public administration has made a final decision on his freedoms or rights or on his obligations specified in the Constitution.
konst2 Source: The Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
Other competencies of the Constitutional Tribunal include:
adjudicating regarding the conformity to the Constitution of the purposes or activities of political parties;
settling disputes over authority between central constitutional organs of the state.
The Tribunal of State
In modern democracies, constitutional accountability is, along with the political one, the most important form of executive power responsibility. It is the accountability for the violation of law. The procedure is initiated by the parliament, but the responsibility is incurred before the authority of the judiciary. In Poland it is the Tribunal of State.
The following persons are constitutionally accountable to the Tribunal of State:
R1GFZ1WRtoFSj
The President of the Republic – for violation of the Constitution, statute or for committing a crime., The Prime Minister and members of the Council of Ministers – for violation of the Constitution or statutes, as well as crimes committed in connection with the position they hold., The President of the National Bank of Poland, the President of the Supreme Chamber of Control, members of the National Council of Radio Broadcasting and Television, persons to whom the Prime Minister has granted powers of management over a ministry, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces – for violation of the Constitution or statutes., Deputies and senators – for the infringement of article 107 of the Constitution (performing business activity involving benefit derived from the property of the State Treasury or local government or acquiring such property).
The President of the Republic – for violation of the Constitution, statute or for committing a crime., The Prime Minister and members of the Council of Ministers – for violation of the Constitution or statutes, as well as crimes committed in connection with the position they hold., The President of the National Bank of Poland, the President of the Supreme Chamber of Control, members of the National Council of Radio Broadcasting and Television, persons to whom the Prime Minister has granted powers of management over a ministry, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces – for violation of the Constitution or statutes., Deputies and senators – for the infringement of article 107 of the Constitution (performing business activity involving benefit derived from the property of the State Treasury or local government or acquiring such property).
Tribunal of State
The President of the Republic – for violation of the Constitution, statute or for committing a crime.
The Prime Minister and members of the Council of Ministers – for violation of the Constitution or statutes, as well as crimes committed in connection with the position they hold.
The President of the National Bank of Poland, the President of the Supreme Chamber of Control, members of the National Council of Radio Broadcasting and Television, persons to whom the Prime Minister has granted powers of management over a ministry, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces – for violation of the Constitution or statutes.
Deputies and senators – for the infringement of article 107 of the Constitution (performing business activity involving benefit derived from the property of the State Treasury or local government or acquiring such property).
The types of punishment imposed by the Tribunal of State:
for crimes – punishments provided for in statutes;
for infringementinfringementinfringement of the Constitution – loss of electoral rights (for a period from 2 to 10 years), prohibition to hold managerial positions or perform public functions (for a period from 2 to 10 years), loss of all or some of the orders and decorationsorders and decorationsorders and decorations.
R8jRF4plilEp0
Exercise 2
Who might be held accountable before the Tribunal of State? Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. A deputy who has performed business activity involving a benefit derived from the property of the State Treasury., 2. The President of the Republic of Poland – for violation of the Constitution or of a statute or committing a criminal offence., 3. A senator who has voted for an unconstitutional act., 4. A judge who has passed a biased sentence, 5. The Prime Minister and the members of the Council of Ministers for violation of the Constitution or of a statute, or for committing a crime within their office or within its scope.
Who might be held accountable before the Tribunal of State? Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. A deputy who has performed business activity involving a benefit derived from the property of the State Treasury., 2. The President of the Republic of Poland – for violation of the Constitution or of a statute or committing a criminal offence., 3. A senator who has voted for an unconstitutional act., 4. A judge who has passed a biased sentence, 5. The Prime Minister and the members of the Council of Ministers for violation of the Constitution or of a statute, or for committing a crime within their office or within its scope.
Who might be held accountable before the Tribunal of State?
A deputy who has performed business activity involving a benefit derived from the property of the State Treasury.
The President of the Republic of Poland – for violation of the Constitution or of a statute or committing a criminal offence.
A senator who has voted for an unconstitutional act.
A judge who has passed a biased sentence
The Prime Minister and the members of the Council of Ministers for violation of the Constitution or of a statute, or for committing a crime within their office or within its scope.
RKZWrUgxEN10f
Exercise 3
Ćwiczenie alternatywne: Listen to the abstract recording to review the material and new vocabulary. Explain the meaning of following words: hearing; offence; validity; conformity; inferior; superior; to cease; infringement. If it's too difficult, use lesson's glossary.
Ćwiczenie alternatywne: Listen to the abstract recording to review the material and new vocabulary. Explain the meaning of following words: hearing; offence; validity; conformity; inferior; superior; to cease; infringement. If it's too difficult, use lesson's glossary.
Listen to the abstract recording to review the material and new vocabulary. Then do the vocabulary exercise. Match the pairs: English and Polish words.
judicial, jurisdiction, common/military/administrative courts, the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Tribunal, the Tribunal of State, constitutional accountability