Przeczytaj
In this section, you are going to read an interview with a psychologist who talks about the causes and ways of avoiding conflicts. Before you read it, think. How do you behave in situations of disagreement? Do you think it is possible to learn how to handle conflict?
W tym rozdziale przeczytasz wywiad z psychologiem, który opowiada o przyczynach konfliktów i sposobach ich unikania. Zanim zapoznasz się z tekstem, pomyśl, jak zachowujesz się w sytuacjach, w których dochodzi do sporów? Czy uważasz, że można nauczyć się radzić sobie z konfliktami?

Match the following words with the correct definitions.
Interview With an NVC SpecialistQ: Good morning. What can you tell us about conflict?
A: There is a certain controversycontroversy surrounding conflict. Most people see it as something inherentlyinherently wrong or something to avoid. However, conflict is simply a situation of disagreementdisagreement between people with opposing viewpointsopposing viewpoints, interests or needs. But nobody thinks in the same way; each of us differsdiffers somehow from others, so conflicts will naturally emergeemerge. We don’t need to resort to violenceresort to violence – conflicts do not have to be aggressive clashesclashes. There are better ways to resolveresolve them. Sometimes, they can be very polite disagreementsdisagreements and can be constructiveconstructive. If we behave properly, they can actually lead to a better collaboration between people. What I want to say is that people who fight do not always fall outfall out.
Q: So, can we learn how to argueargue properly?
A: Yes, we can say that. We can learn how to engage in a debatedebate, how to negotiatenegotiate or, as you said, have a proper argumentargument. There are strategiesstrategies that will allow us to reach a compromisecompromise, where two people take a step back or - even better - a win-win solutionwin solution, where both sides come out of the conflict happy.
Q: How do we do this?
A: What I teach in my nonviolent communication (NVC)nonviolent communication (NVC) workshops is that a well‑managed conflict should not be about two people mindlessly bickeringbickering or quarrellingquarrelling. It will be an attempt to reach a solution.
Q: How can we learn to behave in conflict? After all, such situations are very stressful, aren’t they? When we are stressed, it’s really hard to control ourselves and emotions often escalateescalate.
A: Exactly. That’s why the most important thing is to learn anger managementanger management. If our anger reaches a certain level, let’s say, a seven out of ten, we start to lose control over our actions and even a small disputedispute over a small detail or a squabblesquabble about something trivial might end up in a brawlbrawl. In biological terms, our neocortex or ‘civilised brain’ switches off and the ‘animal brain’ or limbic system takes over and we become aggressive. As a result, we lose the ability to control our actions. That's when it is too late to do anything. So, all our efforts should be focused on controlling emotions and keeping them at a steady level. Let’s say, a six out of ten should be the maximum. If we feel like it might rise above that, we should take a minute off or do something to de‑escalatede‑escalate. There are certain things we should do. First of all, we need to identify the emotions and name them aloud. It’s the first step towards de‑escalation. We also have to learn how to express ourselves using a language of needs instead of emotions. There are also some things to avoidavoid in conflict, for example, trying to hide emotions or asking people to calm down – it rarely works! You can also ask someone to mediate the conflict, that is, make sure that the conflicting sides control their emotions and help them understand the source of conflict rationally. This is what we often do as NVC specialists.
Q: What if we fail to do all those things and the conflict escalates?
A: This is something we should avoid at all costs. A conflict between two people can reach huge proportions and turn into a group conflict and cause large‑scale dissentdissent, which can divide a group, for example a class, and eventually lead to its breakdown. And then mob mentalitymob mentality kicks in and it is a lot harder to control a group of angry people due to enormous group pressuregroup pressure. People will start seeking revengeseeking revenge and this can spiral out of control. It’s very difficult to fix if things go too far. This is when you need specialists in nonviolent communication to intervene. It is a lot better to act early: learn how to control our emotions, how to de‑escalate tensionstensions and resolve conflict by better understanding it and its reasons.
Źródło: Tomasz Wiśniewski, licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
2. Even the most emotional arguments shouldn’t lead to a situation when the conflicting sides 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation to violence.
3. A situation of conflict can lead to a 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation, that is, a situation when friends become detached and stop talking.
4. A 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation is a solution where both sides decide to give up some demands.
5. An action when two people want to gain something they want is called 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation.
6. When both sides are happy with the outcome, it’s a 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation solution.
7. 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation training helps individuals not to become aggressive.
8. A situation when a third person is brought to help the two conflicting sides is called 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation.
9. A person who is 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation wants the other person to ‘pay back’ for what they’ve done.
10. When people 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation or 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation, it means they argue about trivial or petty things.
GRAMATYKA
SUFFIXES AND PREFIXES
W języku angielskim bardzo łatwo zrozumieć niektóre słowa, jeśli rozłożymy je na części i pojmiemy, co oznacza każda z nich. Wyrazy takie jak uncontrollable lub automatically zawierają tego typu części, zwane przedrostkami (prefixes) lub przyrostkami (suffixes). Te pierwsze są „przyklejone” do wyrazu przed jego rdzeniem, a te drugie – za nim.
Przedrostki (prefixes) zmieniają lub podają znaczenie.
Przyrostki (suffixes) podają znaczenie lub zmieniają część mowy .
Prefix | Znaczenie | Suffix | Znaczenie/ część mowy |
|---|---|---|---|
co- | together | -able | ability |
re- | again | -ness, -ion, -ism | noun |
ex- | previous/outside | -ly | adverb |
de- | reduce/remove | -ive, -al, -ous | adjective |
auto | by itself | -ise/-ize | verb |
micro- | small | -ing | gerund/ present continuous |
multi- | many | -wards | in the direction of |
over- | too much | -ful | full of something |
under- | not enough | -less | without something |
post- | later | -er | job title/ ‘doer of action’ |
Słownik
/ ˈæŋɡə ˈmænɪdʒmənt /
radzenie sobie z gniewem (ability to deal with anger)
/ ˈɑːɡjuː /
spierać się (to give the reasons for one's opinions)
/ ˈɑːɡjumənt /
spór (an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one)
/ əˈvɔɪd /
unikać (to keep away from or stop oneself from doing something)
/ əˈvɔɪdəns /
unikanie (the action of keeping away from or not doing something)
/ bɪˈtreɪəl /
zdrada (treachery)
/ ˈbɪkərɪŋ /
sprzeczanie się (petty quarreling)
/ brɔːl /
potyczka, bójka (a noisy argument or fight involving a number of persons)
/ ˈklæʃɪz / / klæʃ /
utarczka, starcie (an angry argument or fight)
/ kəˌlæbəˈreɪʃn̩ /
współpraca (the action of working with someone to produce something)
/ ˈkɒmprəmaɪz /
kompromis (an agreement or settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions)
/ kənˈstrʌktɪv /
konstruktywny/konstruktywna (helpful)
/ ˈkɒntrəvɜːsi /
kontrowersja (disagreement about something)
/ diːˈɛskəleɪt /
deeskalować, hamować eskalację, zmniejszać natężenie (to decrease in intensity or seriousness)
/ dɪˈbeɪt /
debata (a formal discussion on a particular matter)
/ ˈdɪfəz / / ˈdɪfə /
różni się [różnić się] (to be unlike or dissimilar)
/ ˌdɪsəˈɡriːmənts / / ˌdɪsəˈɡriːmənt /
różnice zdań, spory [różnica zdań, spór](a situation when people do not have the same opinion and they do not agree)
/ dɪˈspjuːt /
spór, sprzeczka (an argument or disagreement between two people or groups of people)
/ dɪˈsent /
sprzeciw, różnica zdań (disagreement or difference of opinion)
/ ɪˈmɜːdʒ /
wychodzić na jaw (to come into view)
/ ˈempəthetai /
empatia (the ability to understand and share the feelings of another)
/ ˈɛmpəthetaʌɪz wɪð ˈsʌmbədi /
wczuwać się w czyjąś sytuację, utożsamiać się z kimś emocjonalnie (to try to feel the feelings of other people and understand their situation)
/ ˈeskəleɪt /
nasilać się (to become greater or more and more serious or worse)
/ fɔːl ˈaʊt /
poróżnić się (to have an argument)
/ ɡruːp ˈpreʃə /
nacisk ze strony grupy (direct or indirect social pressure exerted by a group on its individual members to influence their choices)
/ ɡɪlt /
wina (the fact or state of having done something wrong)
/ ɪnˈhɪərəntli /
z natury (naturally, because of its nature)
/ ˈmiːdɪeɪt /
pośredniczyć (jako rozjemca sporu), negocjować (to intervene between conflicting parties to help resolve a conflict)
/ mɒb menˈtælɪti /
mentalność tłumu, psychologia tłumu (people’s tendency to conform to the way of thinking or behavior of a group they are in)
/ nɪˈɡəʊʃɪeɪt /
negocjować (to obtain or bring about by discussion)
/ nanˈvaɪələnt kəˌmjuːnɪˈkeɪʃn̩ / / 'enviːsiː /
porozumienie bez przemocy (an approach to communication based on principles of nonviolence)
/ əˈpəʊzɪŋ ˈvjuːpɔɪnts / / əˈpəʊzɪŋ ˈvjuːpɔɪnt /
przeciwstawne punkty widzenia [przeciwstawny punkt widzenia] (an opposite point of view)
/ ˈkwɒrəlɪŋ /
kłócenie się (petty arguing)
/ reɪdʒ /
wściekłość (violent and uncontrollable anger)
/ rɪˈzɒlv /
rozwiązać, rozstrzygnąć (to find an acceptable solution to a problem or end a conflict)
/ rɪˈzɔːt tu ˈvaɪələns /
uciec się do przemocy (to choose violence over other options)
/ ˈsiːkɪŋ rɪˈvendʒ /
poszukiwanie zemsty (planning to hurt the person who is responsible for an injury to oneself, a loved one, etc)
/ ʃeɪm /
wstyd (a painful feeling of humiliation or distress caused by the consciousness of wrong or foolish behaviour)
/ sɔːs əv kənˈflɪkt /
źródło konfliktu (the reason why a conflict occurred)
/ ˈskwɒbl̩ /
kłótnia, użeranie się (an argument about something unimportant)
/ ˈstrætədʒɪz / / ˈstrætədʒi /
strategie [strategia] (a plan of action designed to achieve a long‑term or overall aim)
/ ˈtenʃn̩z / / ˈtenʃn̩ /
napięcia [napięcie] (a state of unfriendliness, nervousness or worry)
/ ˌwɪn 'wɪn səˈluːʃn̩ / / wɪn wɪn ˌsɪtʃʊˈeɪʃn̩ /
rozwiązanie, w którym obie strony wygrywają (a situation in which both sides win)