bg‑azure

In this section, you are going to read an interview with a psychologist who talks about the causes and ways of avoiding conflicts. Before you read it, think. How do you behave in situations of disagreement? Do you think it is possible to learn how to handle conflict?

W tym rozdziale przeczytasz wywiad z psychologiem, który opowiada o przyczynach konfliktów i sposobach ich unikania. Zanim zapoznasz się z tekstem, pomyśl, jak zachowujesz się w sytuacjach, w których dochodzi do sporów? Czy uważasz, że można nauczyć się radzić sobie z konfliktami?

RNeZauy1rbwJY
Conflicts do not have to be aggressive clashes
Konflikty nie muszą być starciami agresywnymi
Źródło: dostępny w internecie: https://www.pexels.com/ [dostęp 23.12.2021], domena publiczna.
1
Exercise 1

Match the following words with the correct definitions.

R1IJtPtowCpCo
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Exercise 1
R1DmU1hvgQmQW
Ilustracja przedstawia skalę w formie termometra przedstawiającą stan emocji. Widoczne są kolory odpowiadające emocjom. Od dołu skali niebieski, potem zielony, potem żółty, dalej pomarańczowy i czerwony kończący skalę.
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Interview With an NVC Specialist
Tomasz Wiśniewski Interview With an NVC Specialist

Q: Good morning. What can you tell us about conflict?

A: There is a certain controversycontroversycontroversy surrounding conflict. Most people see it as something inherentlyinherentlyinherently wrong or something to avoid. However, conflict is simply a situation of disagreementdisagreements [disagreement]disagreement between people with opposing viewpointsopposing viewpoints [opposing viewpoint]opposing viewpoints, interests or needs. But nobody thinks in the same way; each of us differsdiffers [differ]differs somehow from others, so conflicts will naturally emergeemergeemerge. We don’t need to resort to violenceresort to violenceresort to violence – conflicts do not have to be aggressive clashesclashes [clash]clashes. There are better ways to resolveresolveresolve them. Sometimes, they can be very polite disagreementsdisagreements [disagreement]disagreements and can be constructiveconstructiveconstructive. If we behave properly, they can actually lead to a better collaboration between people. What I want to say is that people who fight do not always fall outfall outfall out.

Q: So, can we learn how to argueargueargue properly?

A: Yes, we can say that. We can learn how to engage in a debatedebatedebate, how to negotiatenegotiatenegotiate or, as you said, have a proper argumentargumentargument. There are strategiesstrategies [strategy]strategies that will allow us to reach a compromisecompromisecompromise, where two people take a step back or - even better - a win-win solutionwin‑win solution/win‑win situationwin solution, where both sides come out of the conflict happy.

Q: How do we do this?

A: What I teach in my nonviolent communication (NVC)nonviolent communication (NVC)nonviolent communication (NVC) workshops is that a well‑managed conflict should not be about two people mindlessly bickeringbickeringbickering or quarrellingquarrellingquarrelling. It will be an attempt to reach a solution.

Q: How can we learn to behave in conflict? After all, such situations are very stressful, aren’t they? When we are stressed, it’s really hard to control ourselves and emotions often escalateescalateescalate.

A: Exactly. That’s why the most important thing is to learn anger managementanger managementanger management. If our anger reaches a certain level, let’s say, a seven out of ten, we start to lose control over our actions and even a small disputedisputedispute over a small detail or a squabblesquabblesquabble about something trivial might end up in a brawlbrawlbrawl. In biological terms, our neocortex or ‘civilised brain’ switches off and the ‘animal brain’ or limbic system takes over and we become aggressive. As a result, we lose the ability to control our actions. That's when it is too late to do anything. So, all our efforts should be focused on controlling emotions and keeping them at a steady level. Let’s say, a six out of ten should be the maximum. If we feel like it might rise above that, we should take a minute off or do something to de‑escalatede‑escalatede‑escalate. There are certain things we should do. First of all, we need to identify the emotions and name them aloud. It’s the first step towards de‑escalation. We also have to learn how to express ourselves using a language of needs instead of emotions. There are also some things to avoidavoidavoid in conflict, for example, trying to hide emotions or asking people to calm down – it rarely works! You can also ask someone to mediate the conflict, that is, make sure that the conflicting sides control their emotions and help them understand the source of conflict rationally. This is what we often do as NVC specialists.

Q: What if we fail to do all those things and the conflict escalates?

A: This is something we should avoid at all costs. A conflict between two people can reach huge proportions and turn into a group conflict and cause large‑scale dissentdissentdissent, which can divide a group, for example a class, and eventually lead to its breakdown. And then mob mentalitymob mentalitymob mentality kicks in and it is a lot harder to control a group of angry people due to enormous group pressuregroup pressuregroup pressure. People will start seeking revengeseeking revengeseeking revenge and this can spiral out of control. It’s very difficult to fix if things go too far. This is when you need specialists in nonviolent communication to intervene. It is a lot better to act early: learn how to control our emotions, how to de‑escalate tensionstensions [tension]tensions and resolve conflict by better understanding it and its reasons.

1 Źródło: Tomasz Wiśniewski, licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Exercise 2
RW6165S8Y60wB
Read the text above and choose the correct answer. There is only one correct answer in each point.
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Exercise 3
RQi4CAzDovjZF
Read the text above. Then drag and drop the elements below to fill in the sentences. Two elements don’t fit. 1. Conflicts frequently 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation when people are stressed.
2. Even the most emotional arguments shouldn’t lead to a situation when the conflicting sides 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation to violence.
3. A situation of conflict can lead to a 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation, that is, a situation when friends become detached and stop talking.
4. A 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation is a solution where both sides decide to give up some demands.
5. An action when two people want to gain something they want is called 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation.
6. When both sides are happy with the outcome, it’s a 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation solution.
7. 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation training helps individuals not to become aggressive.
8. A situation when a third person is brought to help the two conflicting sides is called 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation.
9. A person who is 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation wants the other person to ‘pay back’ for what they’ve done.
10. When people 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation or 1. falling-out, 2. seeking revenge, 3. win-win, 4. resort, 5. compromise, 6. emerge, 7. agree, 8. mediation, 9. squabble, 10. controversy, 11. Anger management, 12. bicker, 13. negotiation, it means they argue about trivial or petty things.
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.

GRAMATYKA

SUFFIXES AND PREFIXES

W języku angielskim bardzo łatwo zrozumieć niektóre słowa, jeśli rozłożymy je na części i pojmiemy, co oznacza każda z nich. Wyrazy takie jak uncontrollable lub automatically zawierają tego typu części, zwane przedrostkami (prefixes) lub przyrostkami (suffixes). Te pierwsze są „przyklejone” do wyrazu przed jego rdzeniem, a te drugie – za nim.

Przedrostki (prefixes) zmieniają lub podają znaczenie.

Przyrostki (suffixes) podają znaczenie lub zmieniają część mowy .

Prefix

Znaczenie

Suffix

Znaczenie/ część mowy

co-

together

-able

ability

re-

again

-ness, -ion, -ism

noun

ex-

previous/outside

-ly

adverb

de-

reduce/remove

-ive, -al, -ous

adjective

auto

by itself

-ise/-ize

verb

micro-

small

-ing

gerund/ present continuous

multi-

many

-wards

in the direction of

over-

too much

-ful

full of something

under-

not enough

-less

without something

post-

later

-er

job title/ ‘doer of action’

1
Exercise 4
RMwujCOREEzkw
Match the following words with their meanings using the table above. rewatch Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. work together, 2. do something again, 3. watch again, 4. having many nationalities, 5. move to a later date, 6. small aggressive action, 7. someone who was a husband before, 8. not cooked enough, 9. remove escalation, 10. under too much stress redo Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. work together, 2. do something again, 3. watch again, 4. having many nationalities, 5. move to a later date, 6. small aggressive action, 7. someone who was a husband before, 8. not cooked enough, 9. remove escalation, 10. under too much stress cooperate Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. work together, 2. do something again, 3. watch again, 4. having many nationalities, 5. move to a later date, 6. small aggressive action, 7. someone who was a husband before, 8. not cooked enough, 9. remove escalation, 10. under too much stress multinational Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. work together, 2. do something again, 3. watch again, 4. having many nationalities, 5. move to a later date, 6. small aggressive action, 7. someone who was a husband before, 8. not cooked enough, 9. remove escalation, 10. under too much stress microaggression Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. work together, 2. do something again, 3. watch again, 4. having many nationalities, 5. move to a later date, 6. small aggressive action, 7. someone who was a husband before, 8. not cooked enough, 9. remove escalation, 10. under too much stress overstressed Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. work together, 2. do something again, 3. watch again, 4. having many nationalities, 5. move to a later date, 6. small aggressive action, 7. someone who was a husband before, 8. not cooked enough, 9. remove escalation, 10. under too much stress undercooked Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. work together, 2. do something again, 3. watch again, 4. having many nationalities, 5. move to a later date, 6. small aggressive action, 7. someone who was a husband before, 8. not cooked enough, 9. remove escalation, 10. under too much stress postpone Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. work together, 2. do something again, 3. watch again, 4. having many nationalities, 5. move to a later date, 6. small aggressive action, 7. someone who was a husband before, 8. not cooked enough, 9. remove escalation, 10. under too much stress de-escalate Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. work together, 2. do something again, 3. watch again, 4. having many nationalities, 5. move to a later date, 6. small aggressive action, 7. someone who was a husband before, 8. not cooked enough, 9. remove escalation, 10. under too much stress ex-husband Możliwe odpowiedzi: 1. work together, 2. do something again, 3. watch again, 4. having many nationalities, 5. move to a later date, 6. small aggressive action, 7. someone who was a husband before, 8. not cooked enough, 9. remove escalation, 10. under too much stress
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Exercise 5
R1EXtYniTShB6
Change the word class or meaning as indicated in the bracket. 1. To work (verb -> noun-person)     Tu uzupełnij     2. To paint (verb -> noun-person)     Tu uzupełnij     3. Sad (adjective -> noun)     Tu uzupełnij     4. Sad (adjective -> adverb)     Tu uzupełnij     5. Bad (adjective -> adverb)     Tu uzupełnij     6. Escalate (verb -> noun)     Tu uzupełnij     7. Calm (adjective-adverb)     Tu uzupełnij     8. Pressure (noun -> verb)     Tu uzupełnij     9. Clash (noun -> gerund)     Tu uzupełnij     10. Bicker (verb -> gerund)     Tu uzupełnij     11. Quarrel (noun -> gerund)     Tu uzupełnij     12. Avoid (verb -> gerund)     Tu uzupełnij     13. Thought (full of)     Tu uzupełnij     14. Thought (without)     Tu uzupełnij    
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Exercise 6
R1EQ1DHGGNEo7
Type in the missing words in the correct form using the noun form in the brackets. A stressful situation when people do not (1) Tu uzupełnij (agreement) with each other can often turn into a (2) Tu uzupełnij (violence) clash. When people become emotional, they often stop (3) Tu uzupełnij(collaboration), which can bring immense loss to the atmosphere and the social structure of a school or a workplace. It is therefore best to (4) Tu uzupełnij (avoidance) such confrontations and call specialists - anger managers who can help to (5) Tu uzupełnij(solution) situations of dissent and (6) Tu uzupełnij (mediation) the emerging conflict. With the help of NVC techniques, they can help to (7) Tu uzupełnij(reduction) the emotions and eventually (8) Tu uzupełnij(escalation) the conflict.
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Exercise 7
RXDH6mOgKuM7C
Type in the missing words using the words in brackets in the correct form and by adding the correct prefixes or suffixes. I was so     1. (fury) Tu uzupełnij     when my boss came over and told me to     2. (do again) Tu uzupełnij     the entire assignment! My     3. (boss before this one) Tu uzupełnij     was also strict, but I was never so     4. (work too much) Tu uzupełnij     when he was in charge - there was much less to do! I was so angry, I felt like I couldn’t control myself. It was as if my mind went into some strange     5. (by itself) Tu uzupełnij-pilot     mode and I couldn’t control myself. I think I might have shouted at him! I feel so ashamed! It was something I couldn’t hold, something completely     6.(not able to control) Tu uzupełnij.     I have always always been in support of     7. (pacify) Tu uzupełnij     but he wasn’t calm either. He was actually being verbally     8. (aggression) Tu uzupełnij,     and we started     9. (bicker) Tu uzupełnij     and arguing quite     10. (loud) Tu uzupełnij     and I felt I had to protest. I am ashamed that it has come to this. I hope I won’t be     11. (without) job Tu uzupełnij     now. I just don’t know how to handle conflict. Perhaps I need some anger management in my life!
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.

Słownik

anger management
anger management

/ ˈæŋɡə ˈmænɪdʒmənt /

RhhO9PNZZtWUA1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

radzenie sobie z gniewem (ability to deal with anger)

RgLAFj6VMmRqI1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
argue
argue

/ ˈɑːɡjuː /

RUWCdD9Y8YBHq1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

spierać się (to give the reasons for one's opinions)

RL0NOAay7qa4b1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
argument
argument

/ ˈɑːɡjumənt /

R13lCdeUfrXCw1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

spór (an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one)

R1N5trewK4EoD1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
avoid
avoid

/ əˈvɔɪd /

RUlIm34SEx9mO1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

unikać (to keep away from or stop oneself from doing something)

R1e3IrbORCGco1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
avoidance
avoidance

/ əˈvɔɪdəns /

RvCBnXil5NCig1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

unikanie (the action of keeping away from or not doing something)

Rnf3J5xsYt3371
Nagranie dźwiękowe
betrayal
betrayal

/ bɪˈtreɪəl /

R1WoNrBXLhuD01
Nagranie dźwiękowe

zdrada (treachery)

RpVUFDZbhD5Tm1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
bickering
bickering

/ ˈbɪkərɪŋ /

RczqimC0dsvL31
Nagranie dźwiękowe

sprzeczanie się (petty quarreling)

RrSY391trlrZo1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
brawl
brawl

/ brɔːl /

R1ac3TEsMS8BD1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

potyczka, bójka (a noisy argument or fight involving a number of persons)

R1V4rwYwZzh3Z1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
clashes [clash]
clashes [clash]

/ ˈklæʃɪz / / klæʃ /

R1062UK75GF9x1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

utarczka, starcie (an angry argument or fight)

RL20lGaIYJjT31
Nagranie dźwiękowe
collaboration
collaboration

/ kəˌlæbəˈreɪʃn̩ /

R1OXXMKLMuUcj1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

współpraca (the action of working with someone to produce something)

RpZofzehUiSga1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
compromise
compromise

/ ˈkɒmprəmaɪz /

RMkmFg7C86vUA1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

kompromis (an agreement or settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions)

R1SgQCs5yoJZR1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
constructive
constructive

/ kənˈstrʌktɪv /

RLJ6iTGWxLVK11
Nagranie dźwiękowe

konstruktywny/konstruktywna (helpful)

R1VZYmPlIDXUW1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
controversy
controversy

/ ˈkɒntrəvɜːsi /

RgXRXv4ZMQUuA1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

kontrowersja (disagreement about something)

RVKoTwAcCT7rm1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
de‑escalate
de‑escalate

/ diːˈɛskəleɪt /

R1D6LNBAyoS6t1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

deeskalować, hamować eskalację, zmniejszać natężenie (to decrease in intensity or seriousness)

R1X7bFrL1lzGM1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
debate
debate

/ dɪˈbeɪt /

R1AZTRbMfuof21
Nagranie dźwiękowe

debata (a formal discussion on a particular matter)

R1TFszlVivb5e1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
differs [differ]
differs [differ]

/ ˈdɪfəz / / ˈdɪfə /

RFewRzfQ3Uu4V1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

różni się [różnić się] (to be unlike or dissimilar)

RumFQGRGOEtZx1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
disagreements [disagreement]
disagreements [disagreement]

/ ˌdɪsəˈɡriːmənts / / ˌdɪsəˈɡriːmənt /

R3WVx1S4gcAeO1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

różnice zdań, spory [różnica zdań, spór](a situation when people do not have the same opinion and they do not agree)

R1KbxBfmkBhtk1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
dispute
dispute

/ dɪˈspjuːt /

RJkTultaNepU41
Nagranie dźwiękowe

spór, sprzeczka (an argument or disagreement between two people or groups of people)

R1CcyA8U0PLqB1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
dissent
dissent

/ dɪˈsent /

RUYyjGS6P1jQY1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

sprzeciw, różnica zdań (disagreement or difference of opinion)

R9yqCxFsz2sHt1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
emerge
emerge

/ ɪˈmɜːdʒ /

R81SuRzHyWLr41
Nagranie dźwiękowe

wychodzić na jaw (to come into view)

R1O7feROIAk3X1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
empathy
empathy

/ ˈempəthetai /

RzdzmoLld2Fg41
Nagranie dźwiękowe

empatia (the ability to understand and share the feelings of another)

R1BpwPf4keIsg1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
empathise with somebody
empathise with somebody

/ ˈɛmpəthetaʌɪz wɪð ˈsʌmbədi /

RhmINUPf81hjr1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

wczuwać się w czyjąś sytuację, utożsamiać się z kimś emocjonalnie (to try to feel the feelings of other people and understand their situation)

RdPXkJOhKlu2T1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
escalate
escalate

/ ˈeskəleɪt /

R1wWC3hvOrkpy1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

nasilać się (to become greater or more and more serious or worse)

R9PzIf7R46aly1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
fall out
fall out

/ fɔːl ˈaʊt /

R1ISv3dP58Umk1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

poróżnić się (to have an argument)

RRLV2FUZNZYwC1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
group pressure
group pressure

/ ɡruːp ˈpreʃə /

R5d9dblgDTMU91
Nagranie dźwiękowe

nacisk ze strony grupy (direct or indirect social pressure exerted by a group on its individual members to influence their choices)

RUUUrYjjlVNX71
Nagranie dźwiękowe
guilt
guilt

/ ɡɪlt /

ROlPi2qyYZYxY1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

wina (the fact or state of having done something wrong)

RD7oUjQrXSEri1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
inherently
inherently

/ ɪnˈhɪərəntli /

R1AB5mGUjlpeL1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

z natury (naturally, because of its nature)

R188EcM9q3FXF1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
mediate
mediate

/ ˈmiːdɪeɪt /

R1CL2Bi0dkcML1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

pośredniczyć (jako rozjemca sporu), negocjować (to intervene between conflicting parties to help resolve a conflict)

R1ed1FhHBcD1S1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
mob mentality
mob mentality

/ mɒb menˈtælɪti /

RCdVWjsoavKcD1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

mentalność tłumu, psychologia tłumu (people’s tendency to conform to the way of thinking or behavior of a group they are in)

R13MGhOhzbkar1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
negotiate
negotiate

/ nɪˈɡəʊʃɪeɪt /

R178TYdiEFvzW1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

negocjować (to obtain or bring about by discussion)

R1aU42AKGR91V1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
nonviolent communication (NVC)
nonviolent communication (NVC)

/ nanˈvaɪələnt kəˌmjuːnɪˈkeɪʃn̩ / / 'enviːsiː /

RpOoGJxRvlKLH1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

porozumienie bez przemocy (an approach to communication based on principles of nonviolence)

RSj3OrcJoyvYa1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
opposing viewpoints [opposing viewpoint]
opposing viewpoints [opposing viewpoint]

/ əˈpəʊzɪŋ ˈvjuːpɔɪnts / / əˈpəʊzɪŋ ˈvjuːpɔɪnt /

R1OOvDgAHthBb1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

przeciwstawne punkty widzenia [przeciwstawny punkt widzenia] (an opposite point of view)

R9MueoDNU8ddd1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
quarrelling
quarrelling

/ ˈkwɒrəlɪŋ /

RLDKFb4YgjCea1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

kłócenie się (petty arguing)

R1PSJfbzwzYnj1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
rage
rage

/ reɪdʒ /

R3OxLZa9LcWpW1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

wściekłość (violent and uncontrollable anger)

RsJpeBIl2kqs61
Nagranie dźwiękowe
resolve
resolve

/ rɪˈzɒlv /

R2U06Q3Ro8vnb1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

rozwiązać, rozstrzygnąć (to find an acceptable solution to a problem or end a conflict)

R1GUIdNkMOv7r1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
resort to violence
resort to violence

/ rɪˈzɔːt tu ˈvaɪələns /

RzdycK1RUxbb11
Nagranie dźwiękowe

uciec się do przemocy (to choose violence over other options)

RHHTk9C9T9JH81
Nagranie dźwiękowe
seeking revenge
seeking revenge

/ ˈsiːkɪŋ rɪˈvendʒ /

R13WeuoKGNANF1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

poszukiwanie zemsty (planning to hurt the person who is responsible for an injury to oneself, a loved one, etc)

RKXZ5KwEByjw51
Nagranie dźwiękowe
shame
shame

/ ʃeɪm /

R1EyEMSTpFG6C1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

wstyd (a painful feeling of humiliation or distress caused by the consciousness of wrong or foolish behaviour)

R2DZiyzDoyosi1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
source of conflict
source of conflict

/ sɔːs əv kənˈflɪkt /

R4ZF7rzl2A61H1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

źródło konfliktu (the reason why a conflict occurred)

RbhZnkkWzIZ7A1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
squabble
squabble

/ ˈskwɒbl̩ /

R4MAnwnHXkGQ71
Nagranie dźwiękowe

kłótnia, użeranie się (an argument about something unimportant)

RIeWSi8sjdnO01
Nagranie dźwiękowe
strategies [strategy]
strategies [strategy]

/ ˈstrætədʒɪz / / ˈstrætədʒi /

R1BxCFm8XdoPK1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

strategie [strategia] (a plan of action designed to achieve a long‑term or overall aim)

RnI1QkJG1Uh0h1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
tensions [tension]
tensions [tension]

/ ˈtenʃn̩z / / ˈtenʃn̩ /

R1brHk7rOEH8U1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

napięcia [napięcie] (a state of unfriendliness, nervousness or worry)

R1HQUImE95Apn1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
win‑win solution/win‑win situation
win‑win solution/win‑win situation

/ ˌwɪn 'wɪn səˈluːʃn̩ / / wɪn wɪn ˌsɪtʃʊˈeɪʃn̩ /

R105Bzs4KJ3ku1
Nagranie dźwiękowe

rozwiązanie, w którym obie strony wygrywają (a situation in which both sides win)

RmUBpy4sbeEYK1
Nagranie dźwiękowe
Rj26X6ZdZmeg1
(Uzupełnij).
Źródło: GroMar Sp. z o.o., licencja: CC BY-SA 3.0.